Jacob Davis came to Chicago fresh out of college and reviewed for ChicagoCritic.com from 2014 to 2016, writing 351 reviews in two years by his own count, mostly theatre along with opera and other live performance. He went on to review for Around the Town Chicago.
Thirteen years ago, Avenue Q perfectly captured the hopes and fears of recent college graduates, and it remains a perfect portrait of early-to-mid twenty-somethings to this day. But those people who first saw themselves in the hapless Muppets are now on the cusp of middle-age, and having significantly shaped the paths their lives will likely unfold on, they might be wondering whether any decisions they are likely to make will still have massive impacts on their futures. For those people, Tom Kitt and Brian Yorkey’s new musical If/Then, now in its first national tour, offers a reflection on where they are now. The story, which depicts two alternate timelines, is one of the more interesting concepts to come from a Broadway stage recently, and this tour features two of the leading Broadway actors of their generation: Jackie Burns, of the tour of Wicked, and Anthony Rapp, who played Mark Cohen in the first Broadway production of Rent.
Joseph Calleja (Romeo) and Susanna Phillips (Juliet). Photo credit Todd Rosenberg.
Music by Charles Gounod
Libretto by Jules Barbier and Michel Carré
Based on the Tragedy by William Shakespeare
Directed by Bartlett Sher
Conducted by Emmanuel Villaume
Produced by the Lyric Opera of Chicago
Shakespeare’s Lovers in the Romantic Era
The Shakespeare 400 Festival celebrates the innumerable adaptations and works inspired by the Bard almost as much as it does the originals, so it’s no surprise to see the Lyric Opera make an outstanding contribution. Broadway director Bartlett Sher’s production of Charles Gounod’s Roméo et Juliette premiered in Salzburg, but this is the first opportunity Chicago audiences will have to see his beautiful staging. This is also an exciting opportunity to hear Gounod’s rich, dramatic score, which while distinctly rooted in the romantic grand opera revivals of 1867 France, includes enough coloratura at times to evidence a baroque influence. Excelling in both spectacle and music, Roméo et Juliette is a magnificent opera, as well as a fascinating look into how Shakespeare was adapted in the nineteenth century.
Joshua Hopkins (Mercutio) and Jason Slaydon (Tybalt)
That said, the libretto by Gounod’s trusted collaborators, Jules Barbier and Michel Carré, should be approached as an adaptation. Having been inspired directly by Shakespeare, it is more true to Romeo and Juliet than Vincenzo Bellini’s 1830 I Capuleti e i Montecchi, the most popular musical adaption up to that point, but it still tells a quite different story. As expected, since it’s in French, nearly every line is paraphrased. There are also a few fixes to the plot, most of which are for the better, such as Lord Capulet (Philip Horst) telling Romeo (Jospeh Celleja until March 8, then Eric Cutler) directly that he is welcome to remain at the masque. But the story also focuses much more tightly on its titular protagonists. The score begins with a heavy march and the entire hollow-eyed chorus delivering the prologue about the infamous two houses. We then transition immediately to Capulet’s masque. Though it is dramatically justifiable for an opera to eliminate the servants’ thumb-biting banter, which isn’t funny and has given generations of high schoolers a bad first impression of Shakespeare, it also substantially alters the dramatic world of the play. This Verona actually is the locale of the kind of melodramatic pot-boiler Shakespeare’s teenage characters imagine themselves to be living in, instead of being a world powered by affected adolescent bravado. But that’s almost just as well, since an opera score is beyond most teenagers, anyway.
Photo credit Andrew Cioffi
So what is the effect of having an older-looking Romeo and Juliet? When Susanna Phillips enters the masque in a daring pink gown, her flirtatious poise is reminiscent of the character Hanna Glawari in The Merry Widow, and not just because Juliet’s “Ah! Je veux vivre” is a waltz. This Juliet is very much in command of herself, but Phillips’s voice really comes into her own during the aria “Dieu! quel frisson court dans mes veines!” the scene in which Juliet contemplates taking the sleeping potion. Sher has imagined it as a hallucinatory nightmare, and the staging combined with the variations in Gounod’s music in this portion combine to provide Phillips with something worth her effort in exploring. Joseph Calleja’s Romeo is a bear of a man who, striding about nimbly in a black trench coat, is clearly the leader of his band. Calleja’s voice is sweet, but incredibly loud, and his hymn to Juliet during what would normally be the balcony scene (Ah! lève-toi, soleil!) is enough to blow the audience away both due to its force and the amazement inspired by his control. Obviously, it’s an effect which works best during his solos. Marianne Crebassa also gives an outstandingly melodious aria as Stephano, a footservant for Romeo invented by the adaptation, and as Mercutio, Joshua Hopkins gives the Queen Mab aria a sinister twist while delighting in its verbal complexity.
Philip Horst (Lord Capulet) and the ensemble
Sher has set the production in the gothic revival of the eighteenth century, providing many outstanding visuals. Catherine Zuber’s costumes and Sarah Hatten’s wigs and makeup are no less a feast of color for staying on the somber side, and the fencing choreographed by B.H. Barry between Jason Slayden’s Tybalt and Crebassa, Hopkins, and Calleja/Cutler is among the most thrilling seen on any stage. However, during this pivotal scene, the acting has a foot in Gounod’s day as far as non-verbal reactions go, and Sher’s decision to use only a single set (Michael Yeargan) for the entire production starts to show its drawbacks. Chorus Master Michael Black has done amazing work guiding the ensemble through moments of high drama; their “Personne! Persone! Le page aura fui!” in particular sounds very similar to “He Trusted in God” from Handel’s Messiah, demonstrating the influence of church music on Gounod. Conductor Emmanuel Villaume ensures that no matter what is happening onstage, the orchestral music is a sturdy pillar around which the production wraps itself. This is a late Romantic-era adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, which for all the similarities in plot, is a quite different story. But it sounds and looks beautiful, and in the context of the Shakespeare 400 Festival, is a welcome exhibition of how the Bard’s place in popular culture has changed over time.
Memories of a Time Before People Had Always Fought Each Other
Recently Silk Road Rising, a theatre company devoted to telling the stories of people of Asian and Middle Eastern heritage, has focused on short runs of one-person shows which directly allow people to challenge narratives about themselves. Their latest, Ziryab, the Songbird of Andalusia, is a combination of dramatic lecture and musical presentation, performed by local musician Ronnie Malley, on the subject of an eighth-century polymath whose life proves that many of today’s “ancient” conflicts are not really eternal. Malley’s musicianship is superb, and his interweaving of his own life with the story of Ziryab’s, as well as his highly-informative discourse on the medieval master’s legacy, make an enlightening performance.
BoHo has been on a bit of a song-cycle kick recently. Like Myths and Hymns and Ordinary Days before it, Fugitive Songs, a 2008 off-Broadway creation by Chris Miller and Nathan Tysen, provides the company with an opportunity to showcase their talented young singers and musicians in a short, easy-to-produce format. The result is a pleasing seventy-five minutes of folk-pop centered on the theme of running away. Though the song-cycle format is more revue than story, director Zachary L. Gray stages each of the nineteen songs as a mini-drama, most of which are cute. True to BoHo’s determination to fully incorporate design into each of their productions, Fugitive Songs is as fun to watch as to listen to. However, “cute” is, for the most part, the extent of this show’s emotional range. Despite Miller and Tysen’s statement that they wrote Fugitive Songs for actors aged 20-40, Gray’s six-person-cast is much younger. Since none of the characters are parents, caregivers, or even have any professional responsibilities, “fugitives” doesn’t seem like quite the right word to describe them starting their own lives.
Charlotte Morris and Justin Adair
The first song in the show, “Reasons to Run,” establishes both its modern folk-style and the camaraderie among the cast that is the key component of this staging’s tone. Chicago musical favorite Justin Adair accompanies the cast on a guitar in addition to Jeffrey Poindexter’s keyboard and Justin Akira Kono’s percussion; later on, cast-member Charlotte Morris plays the guitar and the violin. Adair also sings the first solo piece, “Getting There,” about a photographer striking out in the wilderness, with his usual sweet and powerful tenor voice. Greg Foster, whose West Virginian character in “Subway Song” is more of a sad sack, sings with a slightly nasal inflection and an appropriate bluegrass twang. Demi Zaino first demonstrates her comedic skill in “Annie’s Party,” which is about getting stood up by her boyfriend at an important formal event, and her desire to take revenge while decked out in all her finery.
Front: Julian Terrell Otis. Back: Elissa Newcorn, Demi Zaino, and Charlotte Morris. Photos by Amy Boyle.
With nineteen songs in total, each cast-member gets several chances to shine. Costume designer Emma Cullimore appears to have designed Charlotte Morris’s fairy-like white dress with her song “Break a Branch” in mind. It is suitable for the song’s poetic natural imagery, Celtic-inspired use of drums, and call-and-response structure. Julian Terrell Otis’s first song is the beat-heavy “Washington Heights,” in which his character marvels that he accidentally wound up spending six years living in the Manhattan neighborhood, and vows to rectify that immediately. Elissa Newcorn possesses control over her volume and considerable vocal quality which makes her as much a leader in the female harmonies as Adair is among the males. Their song “Lullaby,” about a woman’s Greyhound odyssey, is the show’s musical apex.
Demi Zaino, Greg Foster, and Elissa Newcorn
Fugitive Songs contains enough musical and tonal variation to entertain an audience for the entirety of its brief run-time. The song “Wilson,” about a stoner who unexpectedly becomes accessory to an armed robbery, is both highly comedic and the only one which introduces any real tension. However, Gray’s placement of cast members as silent observers of each other’s tales maintains a reassuring sense of warmth and acceptance throughout the show. Anthony Churchill’s scenic design is an elaborate stack of suitcases, providing Gray with opportunities to create several engaging stage pictures while keeping the stories’ specificity limited to what we are told in the lyrics. Chamber music like Fugitive Songs demands an intimate setting like the Heartland Studio. The charming young cast members are all fit to share the hopeful, nervous atmosphere of exploration and self-discovery with each other, and by extension, an appreciative audience. And they sound good doing it.
The delicate awkwardness of grief and its potentially socially unacceptable forms are naturally alluring to many playwrights. For maximum confluence of guilt and loss, it is best to have parents mourning a child, and imbue at least one party with cringe-inducing flaws. So it was with Northlight’s Mothers and Sons and Route 66’s No Wake, and now, as part of a National New Play Network rolling world premiere, Lauren Yee offers her own take on the subject. In a Word, under the direction of Jess McLeod at Strawdog Theatre, is frank and brutal during its brief eighty minutes. But with Yee’s imagination and sense of humor, it also contains several surprises, and manages to be emotionally honest without being either hackneyed or irreverent.
Guy (John Ferrick) and Fiona (Mary Winn Heider). Photos by Tom McGrath of TCMCG Phototgraphy.
Guy (John Ferrick) comes home to his wife, Fiona (Mary Winn Heider) one day, hoping to take her out to supper. He’s in a talkative mood, but she’s hiding something, and he soon figures out what. She’s been talking to the media again about her hope of locating their son, Tristan (Gabriel Franken, who also plays every other part), who disappeared two years ago at the age of six. This is problematic for two reasons. First, it makes Fiona sound crazy. A detective has made clear many times that it is extraordinarily unlikely that Tristan is still alive. But Fiona continues to hallucinate that she sees the kidnapper, and offers the detective useless evidence of these imaginary encounters. She also believes that the killer (she sometimes slips up and calls him that) is lurking around the house, and has visions associated with the last time she saw her son, on school picture day at the elementary school where she used to work as a teacher.
Gabriel Franken (Man) and Mary Winn Heider (Fiona)
The other problem with her attitude is that it’s a lie. Guy tells us candidly fairly early on that Fiona’s descriptions of Tristan as an angelic child were not her opinion of him when he was alive. Tristan was adopted, and Guy and Fiona hadn’t known they were agreeing to raise a child with ADHD. Guy treated Tristan with genial negligence. Again and again, through flashbacks, we see the boy absorb some highly undesirable behavior from his father and his friends, which Guy never showed much concern over. We see that Fiona got along with Tristan better, at times, but also lashed out at him when he misbehaved or disappointed her. And Tristan caused a whole lot of embarrassment and disappointment. Fiona’s delusions are driven mainly by guilt, and while Guy pities her and is horrified by what happened, he feels it is high time they moved on.
Heider (Fiona), Ferrick (Guy), and Franken (Man)
How much we can identify with them is a testament to the skill of the actors. Crucially, Yee included a scene of Fiona being a pretty good mom to Tristan, which Heider and Franken perform with touching simplicity. That makes it a lot easier to swallow the way she treats him later. So, too, does having Tristan be played by an adult. This is highly risky, and the drawbacks are on full display, but there’s something especially distasteful about a full-grown man throwing a tantrum that allows us to empathize with his parents. Franken is also able to transform quickly and convincingly multiple times in short order into several other characters, heightening the hallucinatory effect. Ferrick makes his character, too, come across as more immature than malicious. Guy accidently took on more than he was capable of, didn’t rise to the challenge, and now he wants the whole episode to be over. It’s not admirable, but it’s understandable.
Franken (Man) and Ferrick (Guy)
For such a small chamber play, McLeod has given it a complex staging. Actors appear and vanish unexpectedly, props (by Jamie Karas) seem to melt or acquire magical qualities under John Kelly’s lights in accordance with Fiona’s suggestions, and Sam Hubbard designed a few intense fights. Yee’s dream-like language goes a little overboard at times (Fiona gets put on a “leaf of absence” from work, accompanied by a visual example), but she anchors it with vivid, and often harrowing descriptions. In fact, it is the contrast between Fiona’s expressionistic lies about her son and the harshness with which she describes his disappearance that make the end of the play so effective. The play’s text is enough for us to smell Tristan. Yee has shown herself to be an interesting writer, and it’s heartening to see the National New Play Development assisting her development. In a Word’s subject matter is grim, but the delivery is palatable, and it provides a lot to think about.
Directed and Adapted by Robert Falls and Seth Bockley
Produced by Goodman Theatre, Chicago
Goodman Theatre Pushes Itself Farther Than Ever and Triumphs
One of the most anticipated, bizarre, and audacious works in the American theatrical landscape finally makes its debut at the Goodman after years of development. 2666, adapted from the posthumously published novel by Roberto Bolaño, is a five-and-a-half-hour long epic narrative which, like the Chilean author’s novel, radically changes styles with each act. Goodman artistic director Bob Falls took on this project with the sort of expansive vision which can only be driven by limitless ambition and admiration for his source, and yet, even he brought in a co-writer and director, the first time working at the Goodman that Falls had done so. Even with the administration’s support, 2666 required a million-dollar grant from an actor-turned-monk-turned-Powerball winner to finally be produced. The result is a work of such complexity and scope that it is daunting to even describe. But it is one the theatre scene is ready for. Tickets are already hard to come by, and those who attend this masterpiece are assured an unforgettable performance which seems to encompass the entirety of human experience.
Produced by Oxford Playhouse and Chicago Shakespeare Theater
How to Become a Hero with Style
So far this year, Chicago Shakespeare’s World Stages program has hosted two high-quality, yet very different, Shakespeare productions from Eastern Europe. In a change of pace, their latest offering, Sancho: An Act of Remembrance, focuses on a historical figure for whom Shakespeare was an important, but not the sole source of inspiration in his own life. Charles Ignatius Sancho became the first Black Briton to vote in 1774. A writer, actor, shopkeeper, and musician, he is the latest black historical figure to be the subject ofa one-man show in Chicago. The man who plays him, Paterson Joseph, is as charming as his subject, and is also the author of this nuanced portrait of a black man who rose from slavery in the heart of London.
Paterson Joseph as Charles Ignatius Sancho. Photos by Robert Day.
Joseph enters the theatre as himself, and his warmth and cleverness immediately win the audience over. He first became aware of Charles Ignatius Sancho by finding Thomas Gainsborough’s portrait of him in a history book about Black Britons, and was fascinated by the man’s expression as much as his existence. But he did not write this play for any political reason, he reassures us. He wrote it because he was jealous of his white friends who can get roles in British costume dramas, and wanted to give himself the opportunity to appear in eighteenth century gentlemen’s garb (Sancho’s costumes are by Linda Haysman). And then, he just as gallantly quotes from several British historical documents demonstrating monstrous cruelty against African people, and with a sardonic smile, transforms into our prissy, lisping, unlikely, and if anything, even more engrossing hero.
We meet Charles Ignatius as he is posing for Gainsborough. His first words to us are naughty speculation on what King George III wears to bed, since it obviously isn’t the gold finery in his portrait by Allan Ramsay. A valet to a duke has no business being modest, he declares, particularly not when he has a story to tell. Charles Ignatius was born on a slave ship. His mother died birthing him he supposes, and his father killed himself when he saw he was to be a slave. And at this point the narrator is no longer so jocular, for despite his friendship with abolitionist priests, it is a cruel theology that damns a man for such an act. But the boy was picked up by a nobleman, and sent to England as a literal pet for three spinster sisters. The weird sisters, as he calls them, punished him for touching books, but they thought it amusing to dress him up and have him perform in plays. Thus he appeared as Sancho Panza in a Don Quixote adaptation. His moving performance, for as a child, he did not realize that his scene partner was not really dead, and cried real tears, won him the affection of a duke. Thereafter, his new patron’s family protected him and surreptitiously taught him to read Cervantes, Shakespeare, and all the other masters. The fabulous Charles Ignatius Sancho was born.
But life turns out less than fabulous for a freedman in eighteenth century London. In the latter part of the play, Joseph introduces us to Sancho twelve years later, after having been freed/fired for developing a limp, and with a rather unexpected wife and seven children. The economy is hard on a gentleman-grocer, and he no longer finds fops as amusing as when he was one. He still peppers his speech with Shakespearean allusions, but his verve has faded. And either he is getting less resilient, or racism is getting worse, because hearing people viciously argue against abolitionists is deeply disheartening to him. But this is what Sancho’s life has truly been leading up to; there is no secret ballot at this time, and voting is done by mob action. To cast his vote will require extraordinary courage and conviction. But underneath his campiness, there’s a man who knows the horror of slavery, and has always insisted on being recognized as what he’s worth.
It’s remarkable how Joseph nearly plays two characters: the younger, brasher, and older, wiser Sancho, and how he is equally convincing and magnetic as each. The real Charles Ignatius Sancho was hobbled in his acting career by a speech impediment which Joseph chose to interpret as a lisp; but in Joseph’s mouth, it’s an extraordinary tool for conveying subtlety as well as emphasis, wit as well as poignancy. In a time when Europe is agonizing over multiculturalism, Joseph wrote this play in part to demonstrate that London has already been a multicultural society for hundreds of years. For Americans, the story is a reminder of the importance of the right to vote, and the dignity intrinsic in exercising it. In case it’s not obvious already, Paterson Joseph is wonderful company, and some lucky audience members may even get an opportunity to dance with him. It’s a pity he’s here for so short a time; there are only six performances of Sancho: An Act of Remembrance in total. Hurry before he’s gone.
Annie Baker is a relatively young playwright who has become known for her ear for dialogue. Her “Vermont Plays” Body Awareness, The Aliens, and Circle Mirror Transformation were quiet and captured the absurd humor of mundane conversations, while demonstrating her keen sense of perception. They were also deeply humanistic; each of them is about lovable losers in New England who grow before the audience by bonding with each other and gleaning bits of wisdom until they become the balanced, compassionate people most of us aspire to be. Therefore Baker’s drama The Flick, for which she won the Pulitzer Prize in 2014, is a great shock. In it, Baker uses all her familiar tools—the realistically written conversations that are mostly silences and inanities, the small, impoverished New England setting, the idiosyncratic characters—to depict the grueling process of peoples’ humanity being ground out of them. Think the Sprecher sisters’ Clockwatchers, but with sticky floors. The Flick’s Chicago premiere at Steppenwolf, under the direction of Dexter Bullard, is long and feels longer. It seems that to understand soul-crushing grind of the cinema-staff’s lives, we must be put through an abbreviated version of the same process.
Todd Haynes’s 2002 movie Far From Heaven was intended to be an homage to melodramatic 50s soap-opera-like movies. So when Richard Greenberg and Scott Frankel adapted it for the stage in 2013, using slow, atonal music instead of dramatic melodies was a bold choice. Which is not to say that it was a successful one. Greenberg’s book sticks closely to the movie, and in Porchlight Music Theatre’s Chicago premiere, several actors, including Summer Naomi Smart, give intelligent, well-crafted performances. But this story doesn’t feel like it benefits from being a musical, which is unfortunate, because melodramas depend more on their music for emotional impact than on how well actors convey broadly-drawn characters.
Peyton Shaffer (Janice), Nate Becker (David), Summer Naomi Smart (Cathy), and Brandon Springman (Frank). Photos by Brandon Dahlquist
Cathy Whitaker (Smart) is a housewife in 1957 Hartford whose life is everything she had believed constituted “good.” She’s part of the resurgent middle class, her husband Frank (Brandon Springman) has an office job, she has a dutiful black maid, her kids…are a little annoying, actually, but not screwed up in any major way. But then her social status unravels in bizarre ways. Frank starts getting harassed by the police for no apparent reason Cathy can see. That doesn’t prevent a local gossip from interviewing Cathy for a human-interest story to show how respectably uninteresting she is, but during the interview at her house, Cathy sees a strange black man in the yard, and shouts at him. The man, Raymond Deagan (Evan Tyrone Martin), is the son of the groundskeeper, who died suddenly. Cathy’s apology and expression of condolences gets her written up in the rag as a woman who is “nice to negroes,” and her friends start not-so-nicely teasing her for being a radical. Cathy is also surprised while talking to them to learn that it is normal for men to keep having sex with their wives after they have children.
Evan Tyrone Martin (Raymond) and Summer Naomi Smart (Catherine)
One day, after feeling weird about her nascent friendship with Raymond and guilty over keeping her maid from her own family, Cathy goes to Frank’s work to deliver his dinner, and finds him kissing another man. It seems Frank regularly goes cruising the streets, but this time, found a man at the office in a similar situation to himself. Cathy is understandably hurt and insists that Frank undergo conversion therapy, and he agrees to, even though his psychologist outright tells him that it won’t work. It doesn’t, and their relationship declines in an ugly manner. Cathy’s friendship with Raymond is also blossoming, which invites hostility from both the black and white sides of town. After Frank humiliates her at a party, Cathy suggests a vacation will help solve their problems, but that doesn’t work, either.
Mary-Margaret Roberts (Connie), Bri Sudia (Eleanor), Amanda Horvath (Nancy) and Summer Naomi Smart (Catherine)
From the plot description, these characters don’t sound that wonderful, but Smart, Springman, and Martin sell their various conflicts. They’re products of their environment, but also trying to break free from it. Cathy is an especially reserved woman, and therefore somewhat resilient to social pressure. But she’s mostly passive, not a visionary, and doesn’t seem to have much exposure to other ways of thinking. Smart has mastered Frankel’s difficult score, and her opening song “Autumn in Connecticut” is one of the show’s highlights. Another strong piece of music is Springman’s second act “I Never Knew,” which encapsulates the whole show’s themes. Bri Sudia also gives a strong dramatic performance as Cathy’s friend Eleanor, who can see the problems lurking beneath the idyllic suburban life more clearly, but is not quite an ally. Chuck Larkin, as conductor and musical director, has assembled a large ensemble for the many chorus scenes, who perform what is written for them very well.
It is possible that Frankel’s music didn’t come through at its full potential at the performance I attended because the speakers were placed in the audience’s walk-way and were in sorry condition by the time the second act started. But his style is still a very particular taste which doesn’t do a whole lot to elevate Far From Heaven’s social issue soap-opera content, although playing it straight as melodrama may have been worse. Bill Morey’s costume designs are colorful and fun, but Grant Sabin’s sarcastic scenic design, which sets the play in a rudimentary doll house, lacks the superficial charm of Eisenhower suburbia, and the show doesn’t compare favorably with Ibsen. Far From Heaven checks off the full list of 50s social evils, but at this point of removal, without dynamic characters and dialogue, it’s hard to care a whole lot. Fans of the movie may still enjoy it, though, and fans of this kind of music will admire Smart’s voice.
A common fear among young artists is that their survival jobs could wind up overtaking their aspirations. The irony is that a survival job doesn’t even have to be degrading to cause this kind of anxiety; it could even be something that, for other people, would seem highly desirable. Take, for example, the case of Alonzo Fields, the subject of James Still’s one-man play Looking Over the President’s Shoulder. Born in 1900 in the all-black town of Lyles Station, Indiana, this classically trained opera singer practically fell into the job of chief butler at the White House for twenty years. In a sensitive and captivating performance, Manny Buckley as Fields relates how he was witness to some of the most momentous events of the twentieth century and was the confidant of presidents, but never got to do what he really wanted.